Centrelink Payments « Result #2 on Jun 5, 2005, 5:18pm »
Shazza goes into Centrelink in Melton ......
"How many children?" asks the Centrelink worker "10" replies Shazza.
"10???" says the Centrelink worker."What are their names?" "Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne and Wayne"
"Doesn't that get confusing?" asks the Centerlink Worker,
"Naah..." says Shazza "its great because if they are out playing in the street I just have to shout WAAAAYNE, YA DINNER'S READY or WAAAAYNE GO TO BED NOW and they all do it..."
"What if you want to speak to one individually?" says the perturbed Centrelink worker.
"That's easy," says Shazza... "I just use their surnames"
Re: Fathers 4 Justice Network « Result #5 on May 25, 2005, 10:16am »
hey ! Leebee ...
well done.
you hit the nail right on the head.
did you write that yourself or was it lifted from another article?
if its yours you are brilliant!!!
if we could all live by those rules and understand those principles there would be no more divorce or seperation.
on behalf of all caring parents i would like to award you ten stars for this article.
i gotta be honest though...
i was thinking about the judges who destroyed my family
judge linda dessau judge sally brown judge frederico judge mushin judge carter judge bell judge paul guest (especially paul, he really should have known better) and all the judicial registrars with special mention to that mad bastard judicial registrar nikakis
now i started the sentence off as you said:
"What I really like about you is"...
and i gotta tell you Leebee ...
i cant think of one single d**n thing i like about this bunch of human ########.
Re: Mr. Justice Hannan « Result #7 on May 25, 2005, 9:45am »
Father Xmas,
first things first... i didnt get my porsche for christmas. (ooops.. sorry... am i allowed to use a word with c.h.r.i.s.t in it? )
secondly... the reason that this hannan guy and the rest of his mates can do as he likes... is because we empower them to do so!
in fact you just empowered him in your article! ... how? ... you referred to him as justice. thereby endowing him with ultra normal authority.
you see he is not a justice... there is no such thing... he is a judge or a magistrate or whatever.
this man is simply doing what the people of australia empower him to do.
if one simply stood in his court, turned ones back, bent over and dropped ones pants.... he would simply have no power. all he would have is an abusive nature.
if everyone who met him turned bent over and pulled down their pants he would simply be a piece of nuts that everyone mooned. nothing more.
so santa why dont you do the right thing and stop sucking the thingys of these abusers and refer to them by their simple trade name of judge or magistrate?
fact is most of these scum are lower than the puss on a snails belly so i just dont understand why you all keep giving them false titles.
NO WONDER THEY CAN ABUSE US AS THEY DO... WE EMPOWER THE SCUM TO DO SO.
please stop this naughty habit santa... its not the first time i have brought it to your attention.
Re: Colin Ham-Barrister & Judge Carter « Result #8 on May 25, 2005, 9:30am »
Amfortas,
i just popped back to see if any of the gutless brigade had made any inteligent comment on any of the forums here at f4j.
and... guess what? you have! (made a comment that is.. not an inteligent one...)
YOUR QUOTE FOLLOWS.. "We need to get people on-side to fight irrational emotive laws not BE irrational and emotive. And we need to stick to the point."
"NOT BE IRATIONAL AND EMOTIVE? WHAT DO YOU CALL KILLING UNTOLD THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS? INCLUDING SMALL BABIES AND WOMEN IN IRAQ?
its bloody nut cases like you that are the reason we have irrational laws you thingyhead.
you dont find any problem with men of other sexual persuasions wait till you find one chock a block up your sons arse you idiot.
what gives an idiot like you the right to call iraq an idiot country?
i was in the army and i remember nut cases like you. sensless murdering bastards who dont have any respect for decent simple folk who live differently to us.
seems to me you stayed in the jungle too long.. or were you a murdering idiot before you got there?
its no wonder judges and politicians are killing and abusing our kids every day of the week... you are just like the rest of the the dumb arse males in this country.
YOU DONT HAVE A CLUE!
what this country needs is loving caring fathers willing to die for their children, not idiots who refer to other nations as loonies and want to kill for god knows what reason.
what the hell are you doing on this site anyway... you dont have a problem with homosexuals and you dont mind killing innocent people.. what gripe could you have with the family court????
Re: Strategy « Result #9 on Apr 21, 2005, 3:16am »
"I am happy to lend support for bringing attention to the dire state of the Family Law and the associated Courts, but men are practical and need on the spot help in dealing with the Regiments and regimes ranged against them.
Any thoughts from anyone on this? "
I chose a radical and different method to bring attention to the details and sequence of events. I opened up a webblog and named names, addresses, and dates. A webblog has an advantage over a diary -- It can't be stolen so long as you have your password.
And where a diary feels like sneaking around to tattle, on a public webblog you are putting your actions and feeling out there for others to see and comment on as much as the others you write about.
The most effective tool of abuse -- of any kind -- is secrecy. Take that tool away.
Re: Individuals « Result #10 on Mar 31, 2005, 5:41am »
A friend who's going through a seemingly endless battle over his son with his ex-wife, asked his barrister recently: "Who really decides the outcome of these things?", meaning the court that was still in session. His barrister just looked at him, and he tweaked: It isn't the judge, or the evidence -- Its the barristers!::)
If you have an aggressive barrister, he or she may dictate to a weaker barrister what he or she wants. (That's what happened with me with a 2-year veteran named Chris Tsigliianis from Frankston Legal Aid up against an aggressive Neil Hutton.)
If the barrister on the other side is reasonable, and your proposals are reasonable, you may quickly find a reasonable outcome quickly. (That's what he found when his ex got a new barrister assigned from Legal Aid.)
If you are reasonable and the other barrister is lazy and obstinate, you may find that you are in the courts nearly every month and achieve nothiing but frustration. (That was the previous situation with his ex.)
Faith in the judge to carefully weigh the evidence is misplaced, at best. He or she doesn't have the time or resources to pursue the facts in Family Court.
The conclusion is obvious: Pay for a good, aggressive barrister and keep your proposals reasonable.